Construction Materials is ranked #15 of 49 industries by 3-month relative strength, with +5.92% excess return vs the S&P 500 over the last 63 trading days. It sits inside the Materials GICS sector and contains 56 stocks.
As of Jul 6, 2026, the construction materials industry is ranked #15 of 49by 3-month relative strength versus the S&P 500. It is currently outperforming the market, with an excess return of +5.92% over the past 63 trading days.
The 1-month rank is #18, the 6-month rank is #11, and the 1-year rank is #12. Compare these to spot a rotation: a falling 6M rank with a rising 1M rank tells you the industry is turning — money is starting to come back.
The 56 constituents are ranked by relative strength above. See the full constituents table for per-name RS.
How many stocks are in the Construction Materials industry?
56 US-listed core stocks (common shares + ADRs) map to the Construction Materials Fama-French industry as of 2026-07-06.
What GICS sector does Construction Materials belong to?
Construction Materials maps to the Materials GICS sector.
How is relative strength computed?
Each constituent’s excess log-return versus the S&P 500 over the window, aggregated market-cap-weighted across the industry. Industries above zero are outpacing the broad market; below zero are lagging.
Strong climber
This group traded 0.7× its typical dollar-volume today and accounted for 0.4% of total market dollar-volume — a read on how much participation is concentrated here right now.
Strength is spread across many constituents. Healthier rotation; setups likely available beyond the obvious names.
2 of 41 constituents are within 2% of a 52-week high.
A wide move (most names above their MAs) is healthier than a narrow one led by a handful of mega-caps.
Building-material producers — lumber and wood products, cement, concrete, gypsum, clay and glass products, asphalt, and hardware and metal fixtures (scattered SIC across 0800–3996).
Construction Materials is one of 49 industries in the Fama-French taxonomy. SIC code-based classification published monthly by Ken French at Dartmouth. The FF49 groupings are intentionally coarser than GICS or SIC alone — useful for market-rotation reads, less useful for fine-grained screening.
FF49 is intentionally coarse — useful for rotation reads, less useful for fine-grained screening. Read the methodology →