⌘K
Shortlists · ADR Tight
ADR low is only interesting if relative strength is high. This list filters to the top RS quartile first, then sorts ascending — these are the names quietly coiling on top of a stage-2 run. A tight ADR inside a strong RS stock is a tell that institutional players are not distributing; they are holding and accumulating in a controlled, low-volatility consolidation. The risk-reward on entries improves dramatically when range is tight, because stops can be placed more precisely. Tight-range leaders in the top RS quartile are the classic "coiling spring" setup: relative strength confirms the prior trend, and low ADR signals that sellers have stepped aside. The roster filters to 1-month RS percentile above the 75th percentile across the eligible universe, then ranks ascending by ADR% so the tightest names appear first. Cross-reference these names with near 52-week high proximity and volume dryup for the highest-conviction setups.
As of , the ADR Tight shortlist holds 50 of a 50-name cap, filtered from a universe of 3,325 eligible tickers (close ≥ $5, dollar volume ≥ $1M). range family · refresh daily after the US close. Primary receipt: ADR %. Ranking basis: Top RS quartile first, then sorted ascending by 20-day ADR%, capped at 50.
| Rank | Ticker | Sector | ADR % | RS 1m | $ vol | 52w % | 30d |
|---|
| 1. | NUVL | — | 0.9% | 95 | $301M | 99.9% | — |
| 2. | TAK | — | 1.4% | 76 | $48M | 88.8% | — |
| 3. | UL | — | 1.4% | 80 | $237M | 83.3% | — |
| 4. | IBN | — | 1.5% | 86 | $200M | 85.3% | — |
| 5. | FMS | — | 1.5% | 83 | $18M | 82.2% | — |
| 6. | HLN | — | 1.5% | 81 | $88M | 87.1% | — |
| 7. | NVS | — | 1.6% | 78 | $270M | 93.8% | — |
| 8. | GNW | — | 1.7% | 81 | $25M | 99.6% | — |
| 9. | L | — | 1.8% | 77 | $96M | 99.9% | — |
| 10. | CBSH | — | 1.8% | 78 | $67M | 91.8% | — |
| 11. | CNO | — | 1.8% | 79 | $39M | 98.9% | — |
| 12. | DB | — | 1.8% | 77 | $96M | 88.7% | — |
| 13. | IDA | — | 1.9% | 82 | $87M | 99.8% | — |
| 14. | PNW | — | 1.9% | 76 | $128M | 99.9% | — |
| 15. | AGO | — | 1.9% | 82 | $34M | 90.6% | — |
| 16. | MTG | — | 1.9% | 82 | $54M | 94.2% | — |
| 17. | MKL | — | 1.9% | 77 | $151M | 89.7% | — |
| 18. | LYG | — | 1.9% | 79 | $123M | 95.6% | — |
| 19. | MAA | — | 1.9% | 75 | $130M | 92.4% | — |
| 20. | SYY | — | 1.9% | 83 | $290M | 92.4% | — |
| 21. | SPG | — | 2.0% | 77 | $413M | 98.9% | — |
| 22. | UDR | — | 2.0% | 78 | $176M | 98.8% | — |
| 23. | TFSL | — | 2.0% | 77 | $15M | 99.2% | — |
| 24. | CCEP | — | 2.0% | 86 | $184M | 96.1% | — |
| 25. | MNST | — | 2.0% | 76 | $495M | 98.7% | — |
| 26. | PEBO | — | 2.0% | 77 | $8.8M | 98.4% | — |
| 27. | ORI | — | 2.0% | 81 | $64M | 89.5% | — |
| 28. | NWG | — | 2.0% | 78 | $75M | 92.9% | — |
| 29. | BAC | — | 2.0% | 79 | $1.9B | 99.2% | — |
| 30. | PRI | — | 2.0% | 83 | $57M | 99.9% | — |
| 31. | AIZ | — | 2.0% | 80 | $114M | 100.0% | — |
| 32. | SAN | — | 2.0% | 80 | $103M | 98.4% | — |
| 33. | BPOP | — | 2.0% | 76 | $81M | 98.4% | — |
| 34. | CPT | — | 2.0% | 76 | $130M | 99.7% | — |
| 35. | ASB | — | 2.0% | 77 | $59M | 97.3% | — |
| 36. | MICC | — | 2.0% | 78 | $26M | — | — |
| 37. | CNA | — | 2.0% | 89 | $26M | 99.9% | — |
| 38. | ACGL | — | 2.0% | 86 | $227M | 98.8% | — |
| 39. | BY | — | 2.1% | 80 | $11M | 96.4% | — |
| 40. | CINF | — | 2.1% | 90 | $129M | 100.0% | — |
| 41. | KVUE | — | 2.1% | 83 | $365M | 86.7% | — |
| 42. | SNA | — | 2.1% | 76 | $143M | 99.9% | — |
| 43. | AFG | — | 2.1% | 77 | $69M | 95.2% | — |
| 44. | GL | — | 2.1% | 88 | $100M | 99.0% | — |
| 45. | FFBC | — | 2.1% | 81 | $29M | 98.3% | — |
| 46. | APLE | — | 2.1% | 78 | $48M | 97.5% | — |
| 47. | NMIH | — | 2.1% | 84 | $24M | 95.0% | — |
| 48. | WRB | — | 2.1% | 76 | $151M | 91.3% | — |
| 49. | ACT | — | 2.1% | 75 | $14M | 98.6% | — |
| 50. | RDY | — | 2.1% | 76 | $36M | 91.8% | — |
ADR low is only interesting if relative strength is high. This list filters to the top RS quartile first, then sorts ascending — these are the names quietly coiling on top of a stage-2 run. A tight ADR inside a strong RS stock is a tell that institutional players are not distributing; they are holding and accumulating in a controlled, low-volatility consolidation. The risk-reward on entries improves dramatically when range is tight, because stops can be placed more precisely. Tight-range leaders in the top RS quartile are the classic "coiling spring" setup: relative strength confirms the prior trend, and low ADR signals that sellers have stepped aside. The roster filters to 1-month RS percentile above the 75th percentile across the eligible universe, then ranks ascending by ADR% so the tightest names appear first. Cross-reference these names with near 52-week high proximity and volume dryup for the highest-conviction setups. The roster is capped at 50 names and refreshed daily after the US close.
Top RS quartile first, then sorted ascending by 20-day ADR%, capped at 50.
The primary receipt is "ADR %". See the dedicated essay at /reads/average-daily-range for the full definition and how to read it in context.
Daily after the US market close, around 17:00 ET. The footer of each shortlist shows the exact "computed at" timestamp for the most recent refresh.
50 names balances actionable density against noise: below the cap the receipts get marginal and above it the list stops being a shortlist.